UPDATE ON LAKEMONT BLIGHT AND WATER PROBLEMS.
Since our last contact with EON my husband and I have attended one of the Logan township Board of Supervisors Meeting along with several other neighbors. The board of supervisors and manager, Bonnie Lewis, have contacted the Altoona City Water Authority about extending waterlines to our area. As far as we know, they have not received a response yet. We have had our new well tested twice within two weeks. The first test results came out more than 1.00, E. Coli-contaminated-not fit for human consumption and the second test result was less than 1.00 E. Coli-drinkable. As we understand the testing has to be done fairly often as the test results often change. We are still depending on Roaring Spring bottling for our water.
The township has been in touch with the owners of the Lakemont blighted properties and they are making some progress. It looks like all of this is going to take some time. Hopefully we will some day in our life time be able to have a glass of water from our kitchen faucet and not have trash all over the neighborhood.
We would like to say thank you to EON, Jeff Neff, WJACTV, the Logan Township supervisors and Code Enforcement for their help.
Vicki
Lakemont, PA
What do you think?
A TAX AND SPEND BOARD
Hollidaysburg Area School District residents voiced their disapproval of the school building plan last year when they replaced three of the board members with new school directors who pledged to take whatever steps possible to stop the constant tax increases. The last act of those voted-out school board members was to authorize the execution of the contracts for the building addition plan, in direct opposition to the wishes of the voters. The district is now involved in budgeting for the upcoming year, and not surprisingly, the acts of the prior school board membership have opened the door for tax increases for rampant spending. The budget proposed by the school’s administration will require a 6.5 mil tax increase. 6.5 mils to finance a gym that is overpriced and unnecessary! The school board was offered an opportunity to reduce the tax increase by working with the Hollidaysburg Library and the YMCA to create a unique educational and recreational facility. The school district would have received a tidy sum for some land that has limited use. This money would have reduced the tax increase. It would have also required the Little League Field, which is outdated and needs to be replaced, to be relocated, improved, and re-built. There is ample room to move the field and create a new baseball facility as well as to sell property to the Library Board. But the school administration doesn’t want a library; they only want more ball fields. The use of the Little League field is limited to a few teams of 11-13 year olds for no more than six (6) months out of the year. It is NOT a school team or school activity. The Little League mows the grass, but the district taxpayers pay the cost of the utilities – the electricity for huge lights, as well as the water and sewer use. The Little League pays no rent for the land, either. The Little League itself is a wonderful activity, but it should not be supported on the backs of the taxpayers. The current arrangement leaves the taxpayers paying for a private organization’s use of public facilities!
It looks like the existing remnants of the prior school board, who, unfortunately still make up a majority of the school board, continue to kick the taxpayers in the teeth by raising taxes for wasteful projects (the $32 million new gym), by mismanaging public property, and by paying the expenses of private organizations with public funds. And while they raise your taxes and spend your money, they refuse to explore ways to lower expenses or to minimize tax increases.
In 2009, many of the “tax and spend” members of the school board are up for re-election. Hopefully, the taxpayers will replace them with some fiscal conservatives who will put a stop to the school administration’s unaccountability to the taxpayers.
Anonymous
Hollidaysburg, PA
(Official Response Requested)
What do you think?
OF CONSTITUTIONS
“That men mean distinct and separate things when they speak of constitutions and of governments, is evident; or, why are those terms distinctly and separately used? A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government; and government without a constitution, is power without a right.
All power exercised over a nation, must have some beginning. It must be either delegated, or assumed. There are no other sources. All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does not alter the nature and quality of either.”
The above two paragraphs are of common sense and state fundamental truths. These paragraphs introduced a lengthy article written more then 200 years ago, which is as relevant today as back then. This article also points out that a constitution is both a law unto government and the property of the people.
Pennsylvania has had five or six constitutions since 1776, an inordinate number to say the least. Why so many? Each time a new constitution has been written there were assumptions made by government resulting in usurpations (unlawful takings). These usurpations through the years have caused a pronounced shift in authority to the judicial branch of state government with the legislative body being complicit in facilitating these usurpations. The most recent example was the pay raise controversy. The state judiciary’s attempt at linking their pay to that of their federal counterparts would have eventually entailed a complete prominence over the legislative branch by relegating the state legislature to be administrative in nature; much like county government or school boards. In function the legislative branch is legislative and administrative but its nature is to be representative of the people. This would alter the nature of the legislative branch, tacitly erase the separation of powers doctrine at state level and make constitutional law subservient to the judicial branch’s interpretation; had this coup been successful this unified judicial system would have eventually mutated into a federalized form circumventing state legislative oversight; they would serve those who pay their wages.
Granted; would, could, and did, indicate different outcomes; the attempt however was extremely rude, flat out subversive, and heightens suspicions of this court even further given their past behavior. Remember, the state of Pennsylvania has the oldest sitting supreme court in the nation, it would have allowed not only the state courts but also the federal courts to circumvent original safe guards, natural and civil rights, and ultimately undermine fundamental republican principles.
Both the first constitution of Pa. and the federal constitution were drafted, approved and ratified in Philadelphia. The first constitution of Pennsylvania was ratified in 1776; the United States Constitution was ratified in 1787. During this time period the city of Philadelphia was central for intelligence thus becoming a center of communication. The state of Pa. is, and was witness to a wealth of constitutional history; a history of constitutions, which was built in the form of an arch.
In the first constitution of Pa. a declaration of rights was laid down first, then the form of government and its procedures- as constitutional history progressed the U.S. constitution was ratified; here the form of government was laid down then a few years later a Bill of Rights was added. This constitutional arch starts with states constitutions and arches over to the federal constitution. This entire constitutional arch and its history are bound and limited from beginning to end by a declaration of rights and a bill of rights. This was no accident but intentionally done, there is symmetry in form, in intent, in understanding, and in sound construction of republican principles; furthermore, this entire arch of constitutional history sets on a bedrock of principles that this is a Republic, this republic is representative in nature, and being a republic admits in itself that we the people are sovereign by nature and nature’s god to naturally protect, preserve, and defend our sovereignty, our property, our lives.
Since there is an arch of constitutional history there must be a keystone, which is the uppermost and last set stone in this arch that completes it and locks its members together. The keystone in this constitutional arch is known as “tacit or implied assent”. When the disenfranchisement of fundamental rights of and in property and constitutional and republican principles are eroded to a point that becomes alarming to the people they naturally start to withdraw their support by withholding their vote and boycotting the electoral process. In other words, the people have removed their tacit or implied assent to the way we are being governed and it is being done in a civil and natural way. Our founding fathers well understood that it would be the natural tendencies of fundamental principles at work, which would more justly serve the people and serve to protect, preserve, and defend a constitution.
Viewed from this perspective the shenanigans of the Pa. Supreme Court’s failed coup attempt become extremely serious, a treachery which suggests treason. Had they been successful it would have laid the groundwork for an eventual circumventing of the peoples authority, nullified the meaning of a republic, and held in jeopardy our nation’s clear deed and title to real property, - THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE- the only document, which all real property is incorporated under. This arch in constitutional history with its keystone becomes one of the cleverest natural traps ever laid for tyranny.
As the realization of this treachery sets in, past and present suggestions will quicken into frantic cries for a constitutional convention to camouflage the treachery. The problem is not of a constitutional nature. The problem is with two major parties that have used party politics to govern instead of sound constitutional and republican principles. The principles will now demand restitution. The trap is closing.
The Keystone State: A nickname or a pseudonym? Given their predicament the Supreme Court of Pa. will consider it a pseudonym. Constitutional history will endearingly claim it to rightly be our heritage.
The Freeman
Blair County
What do you think?
MORE ABOUT GUN CONTROL